Friday, February 22nd, 2008...9:14 pm

Apple’s Aperture 2 Raw Engine - Worth Upgrading?

Jump to Comments

Ok .. this one I’ve been waiting for a while now … I’ve been getting progressively excited about Aperture 2! And now, it’s finally here. The biggest thing that I am looking for is improvement in raw processing and speed. But, to begin with, Aperture 1.5’s raw processing was already excellent to begin with! And the speed wasn’t bad.

The real difference is in how fast you can achieve quality results. For standard photo processing, the differences are not going to be huge. You definitely have more creative control without having to export to Photoshop for some photo tricks, but in the end it’s still another tool.

One of my favorite photo effects that I REALLY wished Aperture had was a Vignetting effect. Photoshops Raw processing had this from the start (I think), and I really didn’t like having to export every photo to photoshop for a simple vignette effect.

Alas, Apple saved it for release 2.0 .. So here’s a real world test of processing a photo with Aperture 2.0 … It’s a shot from Mimi & Teft’s Shake Your Fantasy video shoot - Mimi and I sitting down. Here’s the raw image exported:

Mimi & Teft - Unprocessed Raw

And here’s about 5 minutes of adjusting settings in Aperture 2.

Mimi & Teft - Aperture 2 Processed

As you can see, adjustments can be fast. And Vignetting is so moody!

Raw 1.1 and 2.0 differences

So far I can see that the Raw 2.0 converter preserves more shadow detail than Raw 1.1 … here’s my hair at 100% with Raw 1.1:

Dark Definition - Aperture Raw 1.1

And here’s Raw 2.0:

Dark Definition - Aperture Raw 2.0

If you look closely at the root of my hair, you’ll notice that Raw 2.0 has more detail extracted natively for the darker portions of the image. This is excellent for extracting the maximum amount of detail possible out of your raw files.

Now, the previous shots were taken with a Canon 40d, which already has a ton of color detail in it’s 14-bit raw files. What about a 12-bit raw file from a Canon Rebel XT?

Here’s a raw shot from Death Valley:

Death Valley - Raw (Unprocessed)

Here’s a conversion from Raw 1.1 with adjustments a few months ago:

Death Valley - Aperture Raw 1.1 Converter

And here’s a conversion from Raw 2.0 with NEW adjustments that I made today:

Death Valley - Aperture Raw 1.1 Converter

In general, I was able to achieve noticeably more shadow detail and contrast, while still keeping the integrity of the photograph intact. The new raw adjustment controls really allow you make refined tweaks without degrading the image, which is AWESOME! I also found that shadow noise was better controlled in the Raw 2.0 converter.

To sum up, is the upgrade to Aperture 2.0 worthy? In my opinion, yes. Aperture was already a cool tool, now it’s even better!

[?]
Share This Sphere: Related Content

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It